Skip to Content | Text-only
A leading research university in Atlanta, Georgia

What We Have Learned

Each June, CTW Ambassadors submit their annual reports on CTW in their programs.  As part of the CTW implementation process, each program was required to devise a plan for assessing their students work.  Most programs choose to use rubrics and focus on embedded assessment, but many have developed their own means of assessing the class, so in concert with the larger accreditation of their degree programs. 

For a complete report of our findings in the 2008/2009, 2009/2010, and 2010/2011 AYs, see the links below.

 2010/2011 Assessment Report

 2009/2010 Assessment Report

 2008/2009 Assessment Report 

 

The following tables were compiled by the Director for Academic Assessment and were based on the narrative portions of CTW Ambassadors' annual reports.  

 

Achievements

(Faculty sometimes report more than one achievement)        

 Student Improvements  24  48%
Faculty Training                                                         14  28%
Revised Rubrics                                                        13  26%
 Add/drop or Revised Course                                       8  16%
Revised Assignments                                                  8  16%
 Hired new Instructors  4  8%
 Increased Discussion Among CTW Instructors  3  6%
 Improved Data Collection  2  4%

 

Assessment

 Improved Critical Writing and Analysis  14  28%
 Improved Critical Thinking and Argumentation  14  28%
 Can’t Assess/Not Enough Data  12  24%
 Improved Drafts and Revisions  5  10%
 No Improvement/Skills Still Unacceptable  3  6%
 Improved Structure and Organization of Papers  3  6%
 Improved Synthesizing Information from Sources  3  6%
 Students are more Confident in CTW Skills  2  4%
 No Answer  2  4%

                               

Needs 

Refine Assignments  

 15

 30%

 Change Rubrics

 9

 18%

 Balance CTW instructor’s workloads

 6

 12%

 More faculty participation and coordination

 5

 10%

 More workshops with instructors and ambassadors  

 4

 8%

 Norming of all classes

 4

 8%

 Changes to course content

 4

 8%

 None

 4

 8%

  

Overall Impact

 More Faculty Discussion                                 

 14

28% 

 Student Improvement                                    

 7

 14%

 Changes to Program                                       

 4

 8%

  Improved Assignments                                  

 3

 6%

 None                                                              

 2

 4%

 

Action Plans

 Revise Assessment Criteria  13  26%
 More Faculty Training  10  20%
 Revise Rubrics  9  18%
 Revise Course  5  10%
 Change Program  3  6%
 Work to Norm Grading  2  4%
 Improve Data Collection  2  4%